Emergency response planning | Nursing homework help
October 10, 2021
B. the ramayana underscores the ideal of hindu womanhood through
October 10, 2021

Based on your analysis, how do you believe this situation may affect public perception of your selected company? Will the public discourse reflect possible legal outcomes? Be sure to use specific examples

MBA 610 Final Project Part I, Milestone Two Guidelines and RubricOverview: In Milestone Two you will continue to submit sections of the memorandum. In Module Five, submit the Application of the Law to the Facts and theImpact Assessment (IID and IIE) of the memorandum.Prompt: In the Application of the Law to the Facts section, use the precedents you have selected in case law, regulations, and substantive law, assess thestrengths and weaknesses of your company’s arguments in court. In the Impact Assessment section, based on your analysis, how do you believe this situationmay affect public perception of your selected company? Make sure to incorporate the feedback you receive on this assignment into your final submission.You are an intern at the legal department at one of the companies in the following scenario (Greene or Howell) and tasked with compiling a memo for yoursupervisor, which will be used to formulate an official executive brief of these lawsuits.ScenarioMary Jane and Allen Greene, a married couple, own a high-end costume jewelry manufacturing and distribution company called Greene’s Jewelry Wholesale,LLC. The principal place of business for Greene’s Jewelry is in Derry, New Hampshire, where it owns a warehouse and two storefronts.Originally started in 1957, the company expanded over five decades, and it now employs 502 individuals in a variety of departments, including sales andmarketing, research and development, human resources, and manufacturing.The primary asset of Greene’s Jewelry is its patented process for creating a synthetic gold-colored material called “Ever-Gold,” which is used in Greene’snecklaces, rings, earrings, and bracelets. Ever-Gold is impervious to scratches, discoloration, oxidization, and is marketed as “everlasting gold.”Jennifer Lawson, who has been employed for three years as a junior executive secretary in the research and development department at Greene’s Jewelry, hasjust learned that she is pregnant. She has earned high marks on each of her annual reviews with the company, with the exception of the fact that she routinelyshows up 15 to 30 minutes late for work. Otherwise, she is deemed to be professional, articulate, diligent, and skilled in her role with the company. When Lawsonadvises the head of human resources, Lisa Peele, that she may have to take additional time off as a result of some high-risk factors that she will face during thecourse of her pregnancy, she is told that her position has been eliminated. The specific words are: “Congratulations Jennifer! That is exciting news for you. We donot need to worry about time off, though, because, regrettably, I was just going to let you know that we are downsizing and no longer have a need for any of ourjunior executive secretaries.”Jennifer is distraught, and immediately returns to her desk to clear it out as instructed. She removes all of her personal items, as well as the projects she wasworking on prior to her discussion with Lisa Peele. When she returns to her home, she realizes that she has inadvertently taken a draft letter to Greene’s patentattorney, which details the secret process for creating Ever-Gold.Although Greene’s Jewelry requires all of its executives to sign covenants not to compete and confidentiality agreements, Jennifer was only required to sign aconfidentiality agreement, by which she agreed never to disclose any information that she might acquire from Greene’s regarding the process used to createEver-Gold.Panicked, and knowing that she needs a job, she calls one of Greene’s competitors, Howell Jewelry World, and advises its hiring manager that she is a formeremployee of Greene’s, that she needs a job, and that she has confidential information about Ever-Gold that would help Howell compete with Greene’s. Thehiring manager at Howell, Naomi White, schedules an interview with Jennifer for the following day.At the end of the interview, Naomi makes an offer to Jennifer to begin work with Howell immediately, but she conditions the offer on Jennifer’s execution of anemployment contract. The contract contains two specific provisions that Naomi insists Jennifer read and initial, in addition to signing the contract as a whole. Oneof those provisions states that Jennifer will disclose the information she has regarding the Ever-Gold process prior to commencing work with Howell. The otherprovision is a covenant to not work for any competitor of Howell for two years after she leaves the employ of Howell, irrespective of the reason for leaving, andwhether she quits or is fired. Jennifer initials both of the provisions, signs the contract for employment, and gives Naomi a copy of the letter that she removedfrom her desk at Greene’s.One week after she starts working with Howell, Jennifer is fired for chronic tardiness, and she thereafter gets a job working as a sales associate with the onlyother jewelry company in town, Triumph Jewels.Meanwhile, Greene’s learns that Howell has acquired knowledge of the secret process used to create Ever-Gold, and that Howell has tweaked the process slightlyso as to avoid any patent infringement issues but to still create a product with similar characteristics and qualities of Ever-Gold. Howell, for its part, has learnedthat Jennifer is working for a competitor and fears that Jennifer will disclose the process to Triumph. Finally, one of Howell’s customers had developed adisfiguring rash as a direct result of the new process Howell has begun using in its jewelry.Greene’s sues Jennifer for breach of the confidentiality agreement when it learns that she has given confidential information to Howell. Jennifer counter-suesGreene’s for wrongful termination. Howell sues Jennifer for breach of the covenant not to compete, and Jennifer counter-sues for fraudulent inducement,believing that she was tricked into signing the employment contract with Howell and that Howell was never interested in hiring her, but was interested only inacquiring information on the process to create Ever-Gold. Howell also sues Triumph, claiming that it knew or should have known that Jennifer was subject to acovenant not to compete, and that Triumph should therefore be bound by its provisions.Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:II. Client’s CaseD. Application of the Law to the Facts: Using the precedents you have selected in case law, regulations, and substantive law, assess the strengthsand weaknesses of your company’s arguments in court. Is it probable your company will win this legal dispute?E. Impact Assessmenti. Based on your analysis, how do you believe this situation may affect public perception of your selected company? Will the publicdiscourse reflect possible legal outcomes? Be sure to use specific examples.ii. Make suggestions on how to alleviate any damages to your selected company’s public perception going forward. Will action(s) relatedto the other party be appropriate?iii. Recommend how the company should modify specific business practices to avoid similar situations in the future.Guidelines for Submission: Your memorandum should be 4–5 pages, using 12-point Times New Roman font and one-inch margins. You should use current APAstyle guidelines for your citations and reference list. Generally speaking, the best memos include references to at least two cases for each point of law that ismentioned. Students also earn high marks when they cite cases that appear to support a different legal resolution than the one presented by the student, andthen distinguish that case from the scenario described in this assignment. Such distinctions demonstrate exemplary understanding of the course materialsInstructor Feedback: This activity uses an integrated rubric in Blackboard. Students can view instructor feedback in the Grade Center. For more information,review these instructions.Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (75%) Not Evident (0%) ValueApplication ofthe Law to theFactsLogically assesses the strengthsand weaknesses of company’sarguments in court based onselected laws and precedents,addressing likelihood of winninglegal disputeAssesses the strengths andweaknesses of company’sarguments in court based onselected laws and precedents,addressing likelihood of winninglegal dispute, but with gaps inlogic, detail, or relevance toselected laws or precedentsDoes not assess the strengths andweaknesses of company’sarguments in court based onselected laws and precedents24ImpactAssessment:PublicPerceptionLogically evaluates how legalsituation may affect publicperception of company, providingspecific examplesEvaluates how legal situation mayaffect public perception ofcompany, providing specificexamples, but has gaps in logic ordetailDoes not evaluate how legalsituation may affect publicperception of company22ImpactAssessment:DamagesMakes appropriate suggestionsfor how to alleviate damages tocompany’s public perception,addressing whether actionsrelated to other party areappropriateMakes suggestions for how toalleviate damages to company’spublic perception, addressingwhether actions related to otherparty are appropriate, but not allsuggestions are appropriate orkey details are missingDoes not make suggestions forhow to alleviate damages tocompany’s public perception22ImpactAssessment:BusinessPracticesMakes appropriaterecommendations for how thecompany should modify specificbusiness practices to avoid similarsituations in the futureMakes recommendations on howthe company should modifyspecific business practices toavoid similar situations in thefuture, but not allrecommendations areappropriate or key details aremissingDoes not make recommendationsfor how the company shouldmodify specific business practicesto avoid similar situations in thefuture22Articulation ofResponseSubmission has no major errorsrelated to citations, grammar,spelling, syntax, or organizationSubmission has major errorsrelated to citations, grammar,spelling, syntax, or organizationthat negatively impact readabilityand articulation of main ideasSubmission has critical errorsrelated to citations, grammar,spelling, syntax, or organizationthat prevent understanding ofideas10Total 100%

"Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now"